Fixes for cross compilation #194
@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ let
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
source = if (useGit) then git else release;
|
||||
|
||||
isCross = stdenv.hostPlatform != stdenv.buildPlatform;
|
||||
in
|
||||
stdenv.mkDerivation (source // {
|
||||
pname = "nanos6";
|
||||
@@ -72,9 +74,13 @@ in
|
||||
"--disable-all-instrumentations"
|
||||
"--enable-ovni-instrumentation"
|
||||
"--with-ovni=${ovni}"
|
||||
"--with-boost=${boost.dev}"
|
||||
] ++
|
||||
(optional enableJemalloc "--with-jemalloc=${jemallocNanos6}") ++
|
||||
(optional enableGlibcxxDebug "CXXFLAGS=-D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG");
|
||||
(optional enableGlibcxxDebug "CXXFLAGS=-D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG") ++
|
||||
# Most nanos6 api symbols are resolved at runtime, so prefer
|
||||
|
abonerib marked this conversation as resolved
Outdated
|
||||
# ifunc by default
|
||||
(optional isCross "--with-symbol-resolution=ifunc");
|
||||
|
||||
postConfigure = lib.optionalString (!enableDebug) ''
|
||||
# Disable debug
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
We may want to add a comment on why we explicitly chose ifunc over indirect. I forgot why we usually want ifunc.
I am not sure either, nanos6 uses
ifuncas the default and indirect the fallback:57f0d9e5b0